White Supremacy
in the Age of Trump Excerpts from a talk by Loretta Ross – November 4,
2017 – Amherst, MA Loretta Ross gave the keynote address as the
War Tax Resistance Gathering in Amherst, Massachusetts, on November 4. She
teaches “White Supremacy and Appropriate Whiteness in the Age of Trump” as a
Visiting Assistant Professor of Women's Studies at Hampshire College in
Amherst, Massachusetts.
Note: These excerpts are just part of a longer talk; the full version is on
NWTRCC’s YouTube channel, linked at nwtrcc.org. We’ve left out most ellipses for
ease of reading. I have the immense privilege of having 25 of the
brightest kids you will ever see eagerly embracing a strategy for
deconstructing white supremacy from a place of whiteness. They are students of
pretty good privilege. If they wanted to, they could just melt back into
society, and no one would ever offer a critique of what they are doing because
it would be usual, expected, customary. And yet they are choosing to learn how
to become active resisters. …To me that’s why this historical moment is so
precious, because those of us who have been objects of enslavement and
genocide, we’ve been saying white supremacy is in America’s DNA. But the fact
there is a significant portion of the white population that’s understanding
that the currency of white supremacy is counterfeit is new and different.
I have studied the fascist movement for the last 30 years. In the 1990s my job
was to monitor hate groups at the Center for Democratic Renewal, formerly known
as the National Anti-Klan Network...under the leadership of Rev. C. T. Vivian.
[He] came to work one day and literally told the staff “if you ask people to
give up hate then you have to be there for them when they do.” I started
talking to people who had been in the Klu Klux Klan, the militia movement, the
Aryan Nations, etc. It was probably the most challenging and interesting work
that I ever did, because I found out that once you got to know someone in the
hate movement, it was really hard to continue to hate them. I used to say “Oh
they’re like roaches. They come out at night when you turn the lights out.” And
then I saw them as human beings, hurting human beings, but human beings
nonetheless. Of course, this just messed up my thinking because if a Black
woman can’t hate the Klan, who’s left to hate?
In this current epoch, we’re talking about Trump supporters. The perspective
I’m trying to offer the students I’m teaching and the audiences I get to speak
to about white supremacy is that we are going to have to take a longitudinal
view of what we are facing, because Trump was so clearly an outcome, not a
cause.
What we are witnessing is what happened after the success of the civil rights
movement of the 1950s and 1960s. The people who felt they had lost control of
this democracy and their determination to protect white privilege and white
supremacy developed a multi-decade plan to regain power. To implement this plan,
they pulled together not only people who had been resistant to the civil rights
movement, the diehard segregationists, but they also thought that they needed
to foment culture wars against LGBT rights, women’s rights, abortion rights,
immigrants, workers’ rights, environmental justice. They just perfected the
politics of white grievance against modernity.
[I]n about thirty years the demographics are going to shift so thoroughly that
white people will no longer be the majority in America. So what we see now is
their total deconstruction of the mechanics of democracy, because they no
longer think democracy works in their best interests anymore. Not that we ever
had a perfect democracy to begin with, but when you tie their attacks on voting rights, gerrymandering, the media,
education, the judiciary, government regulation of corporations, what is truth
even — facts — science, all of that, you get a very alarming dystopian picture,
that these people are deconstructing the very mechanisms we count on protecting
egalitarian democratic society, and they are trying to create a society that
allows an embittered minority to stay in control.
I’ll stop and define it: White supremacy is a body of ideas, it is not a race
of people. It’s a body of ideas comprised of racism, homophobia, Christian
nationalism, ableism, sexism, anti-environmentalism. There are so many parts of
this thing called white supremacy that I think the most frequent mistake people
make is working on only one aspect of it, and thinking they are seeing the
whole thing. You have to see it as a totalizing system, a toxic sea in which we
all swim, so that in the final analysis every white person is not a white
supremacist and every white supremacist is not white.
That’s what we face, and my question is, are we who are trying to fight the
ravages of the white supremacist movement sufficiently “woke” enough to realize
that we need our own multi-decade plan?
For me, fighting white supremacy is what I’m against, but the vision that I
want to talk about is a vision of a world based on human rights. That’s what
I’m fighting for. I really like the fact that in 1948 the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights was shepherded in under the leadership of former first lady
Eleanor Roosevelt to allow us to define societies in which people treat each
other based on our need for each other, our human interdependence, the need for
a cultural caring philosophy and morality as opposed to atomization,
individualism, and alienation, which is what our present society operates on.
We should have been building a U.S.-based human rights movement, holding our
government accountable for its human rights violations here and around the
world. We should have been organizing ourselves as the women’s rights wing of
the human rights movement, working with the anti-racist wing of the human
rights movement, and the peace wing of the human rights movement, and the
environmental wing of the human rights movement. Instead we’ve been in identity
silos acting like we’re the divided and the conquered, and our enemies, have
just taken advantage of that. [W]e’re so engaged in a call-out culture,
criticizing each other’s activism...that we forgot to be strategic together and
share a vision.
There is no way you can live in the South and not know the names of the people
who died — black, white, women, men — who died for your right to do this work.
So when you have those kinds of dates in your soul and on your shoulders you
tend to become overly serious, humorless... I couldn’t even go to a
movie without offering a critique of its racial and gender politics. It was
overwhelming, until Leonard Zeskind told me,
“Loretta, lighten up. Fighting nazis should be fun, being a
nazi is what sucks.” And I’ve never forgotten that phrase.
When you’re fighting on the side of justice and truth and righteousness it’s a
perfect struggle. You don’t have to be perfect. The struggle is. You can bring
your imperfect self to the work. That’s what we need to dismantle white
supremacy, white people who are self-critical enough and brave enough to take
risks and learn new mistakes as they go along. Loretta Ross was a co-founder and the
national coordinator of the SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Justice
Collective from 2005-2012. She is an expert on women’s issues, hate groups,
racism and intolerance, human rights, and violence against women. Her work
focuses on the intersectionality of social justice issues and how this affects
social change and service delivery in all movements. |
 |
|||||
 
CategoriesDred Feminist RantsSpeeches |
|
 |
|||
    |
|||||
